Check back... Remember that I said we had to restrict it to |
![]() |
? |
Well, here's the graph of
![]() |
for |
![]() |
: |
![]() |
Oh! THIS guy IS one-to-one! Get it now? |
You saw why this is such a big stinkin' deal in the second section.
YOUR TURN:
Does |
![]() |
have an inverse function? |
* Just graph it and see if it's one to one.
Does |
![]() |
have an inverse function? |
If it doesn't, fix it so that it does.